Operational AI · Signed decision supportTreasury transfer scenario · YubiKey protected

The model assembles the case. The operators decide.

A treasury officer asks whether a proposed transfer fits the contract. The model gathers signed context for the people holding the keys—then gets out of the authorization path.

The assignment

Give the signers enough context to say yes—or stop the transfer.

The LLM is asked to examine one proposed Bitcoin transfer. It resolves the destination against a deterministic contract, places the amount inside the vault’s recorded history, identifies the valid signing paths, and prepares the evidence for each officer.

That output is decision support, not approval. Red, Blue, and the HSM policy remain independent of the model. The officers should inspect the evidence, challenge the explanation, and refuse the request when the case does not hold.

01 · Deterministic system

Establishes the facts.

Address enrollment, contract identity, completed history, threshold policy, and signed bytes are checked without model judgment.

02 · LLM

Builds the context.

Organizes the ranges, dates, outputs, and signing paths so each key holder can see what deserves attention.

03 · Operators

Validate and decide.

Review the signed information, verify destination and policy, question the explanation, then authorize or reject with their own keys.

Signed transfer context

Know the context arrived intact.

The signature shows that the information matches the bytes issued by TrackBTC. It does not prove the transfer is safe; that judgment stays with the operators.

Review
TX-084 / context-v1
Signed by
TrackBTC Evidence Key 03
Fingerprint
9e71…c42a
Integrity
Signature valid
Protected transfer context

Unlock with your YubiKey.

Enrolled operators use a registered hardware key to open the signed facts and model explanation before they decide.

Product preview · No credential is requested here
The operating principle
Context should travel with receipts. Authority should stay with the keys.

The useful model does not make the decision. It makes evidence easier to inspect, uncertainty visible, and accountable operators able to validate the case themselves.